There's a piece of advice that gets repeated so often in business circles that it's started to feel like gospel: if you want to scale, you have to get out of the way.

It follows the typical path: Remove yourself. Build systems. Make yourself redundant.

The implication, of course, is that owner dependency is a disease — and your job is to cure it.

I've heard this a hundred times. I see it all over the internet. 

And I totally disagree with it.

I've seen this play out across family and investor-owned businesses. And here’s the nuance: The stage of the business matters far more than the ownership structure when it comes to this one.

When your business is smaller, owner dependency isn't a flaw in the model. It is the model. 

—> You wear multiple hats because the business can't yet afford the people who would otherwise wear them. 

—> Your clients want to work with you. (It’s also probably part of why they signed up in the first place.)

—> Your employees want to connect with you because culture flows directly from the top, and you're still close enough to the work to matter to them personally.

These aren't signs of dysfunction. They're just the realities of where you are right now.

The problem with this general, "get out of the way" advice isn't that it's wrong — it's that it's incomplete. It's written for a different stage of company, and applied too early or in the wrong circumstances, it can do real damage. 

Pulling back from client relationships before you have someone capable of holding them costs you accounts. Delegating key decisions before your team is ready creates expensive mistakes.

Here's the distinction I've come to rely on: there's a difference between being a bottleneck and being a differentiator.

The bottleneck slows things down. The differentiator changes the outcome.

I learned this firsthand during a crisis several years ago.

We had a cyber incident that nearly brought us to our knees. During that time, every part of the business was getting challenged. And it was also during that time that I sat across the table from a major client — with their whole team on the other side — and walked them through exactly what happened and what we were doing about it. 

The questions were tough and completely fair. But I showed up, I owned it, and it built trust in a way that no one else in my organization could have replicated.

I could have sent my IT Director or head of operations. But, sending someone else into that room would have been the wrong call — and our client would have known it.

That's the real risk of removing yourself too early: you lose the ability to make the impact when it matters most.

You'll know when it's time to genuinely step back. You'll have the revenue to support it, the right people to hand it to, and the depth to absorb the transition. Until then, your presence isn't the problem to solve.

In a smaller business, it's often the edge your competitors can't buy.

So here's what I'd ask you to sit with this week: Where in your business are you a bottleneck and where are you actually the differentiator? That line is worth knowing and re-assessing from time to time.

Hit reply and let me know what you think. I read every response.

Until next week, 

Cabot

It’s taken a lot to get this newsletter shipped and out the door. It (finally!) falls into the adage of better to ship than wait for perfection… 

If you’re on the list because you subscribed, thank you! If you’re on the list and wondering how, know that I count you as a friend! 😉

In either case, and if you have a moment, please drop a reply. I’d welcome your feedback.